LPS France

French Quality, Worldwide Efficiency

Area protected to date by LPS France ® solutions throughout the world

Introduction

The confusion between lightning rod And surge protector is still very common, including among building and industrial professionals. Yet, the international standard IEC 62305:2024 (Protection against lightning) clearly distinguishes these two devices, which do not have neither the same role, nor the same location, nor the same objective.

👉 In summary:

These two systems are complementary, but not interchangeable.
In this article, we explain their differences, their place in the IEC 62305:2024 standard and how to combine them effectively.


1. What the IEC 62305:2024 standard says

The IEC 62305 standard is structured in 4 parts:

PartContent
IEC 62305-1General principles
IEC 62305-2Risk analysis
IEC 62305-3Protection against physical damage (LPS)
IEC 62305-4Protection of electrical and electronic systems

👉 The lightning rod is covered in part 3 (LPS – Lightning Protection System).
👉 The surge protector is covered in part 4 (SPM – Surge Protection Measures).

It is a voluntary and fundamental separation.


2. The lightning rod: protection against direct impact

Role

THE lightning rod is part of the External LPS.
Its mission is to:

Components according to IEC 62305-3

A lightning protection system includes:

  1. Capture device (tip, cage, ESE, overhead conductor)
  2. Grounding conductors
  3. Grounding

Types of lightning rods

Example LPS France

The ranges Ellips And Paraton@ir LPS France products are designed to ensure the protection against direct lightning, with :


3. The surge protector: protection against power surges

Role

THE surge protector (SPD – Surge Protective Device) does not stop lightning.
It limits transient overvoltages caused by:

Location

The SPDs are installed:

Normative reference

IEC 62305-4 defines the protected areas (LPZ) :


4. Lightning rod ≠ Surge protector: common mirods

“I have surge protectors, I don’t need a lightning rod.”
➡ False. The lightning arrester does not protect against a direct strike.

“My lightning rod also protects electronic equipment”
➡ False. Without SPD, power surges enter the building.

“One replaces the other”
➡ False. The IEC 62305 standard mandates a global approach.


5. The correct approach according to IEC 62305:2024

The standard recommends a layered protection :

Level 1: External protection

✔ Lightning rod (LPS)
✔ Downhill Drivers
✔ Land of Lightning

Level 2: Internal Protection

✔ Type 1 / 2 / 3 surge protectors
✔ Equipotentiality
✔ Shielding / Separation

Level 3: Supervision & Maintenance

✔ Periodic check-up
✔ Continuity of the descents
✔ Intelligent monitoring (e.g. LPS Manager)


6. Why lightning rods will still be essential in 2026

With the increase:

👉 The probability of direct impact increases.

The IEC 62305:2024 standard reinforces the logic of risk management :
if the risk R exceeds the tolerable threshold, An external LPS is mandatory.

This is precisely the area of ​​expertise of LPS France, manufacturer of lightning rods for over 20 years.


7. Summary: when to use what?

SituationLightning rodLightning arrester
Possible direct impact✅ required❌ insufficient
Network surges❌ Ineffective on its own✅ required
Critical building✅ yes✅ yes
Isolated/exposed site✅ indispensable✅ supplement
Protection compliant with IEC 62305

Conclusion

The standard IEC 62305:2024 leaves no room for doubt:
👉 Lightning rods and surge protectors are complementary.

Omitting either one leaves a critical gap in protection.

The solutions Ellips And Paraton@ir of LPS France They fit fully into this normative logic, with a modern, connected and sustainable approach to lightning protection.